Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Beasley vs. Rose


Be-Easy vs. D. Rose, Chicago has some decisions to make...

Wow. Didn't see that one coming.

You know, I've had a long couple of weeks and quite frankly, I was in need of some rest. That's what moving into a new place, starting a new job, doing community service, socializing on the weekends, and having a rambunctious, aggressive lady-friend who keeps you up at night will do to you. (oh, boy...) Needless to say, I was frustrated to find out that I had slept through two big moments this evening. First, Kevin Garnett being as aggressive and assertive in Game One vs. the Pistons as his Game Seven performance as a member of the Timberwolves vs. Sacramento back in 2004 (32 points, 21 rebounds, two assists, five blocks, and four steals.)

Second...well, that's the one I didn't see coming.

With the first pick of the 2008 NBA Draft, the Chicago Bulls will select...

Really? Is this how the basketball gods treat us? The team who has mismanaged their own talent as poorly as the Clippers in the last ten years? Okay, that might be slightly overboard but for a team who's been as loaded with talent as Chicago I almost feel as if they don't deserve the chance of picking number one.

With that being said, the debate for the next month will be who will Chicago take?

Derrick Rose. Michael Beasley.

For the life of me, this seems to be an obvious choice. You have a highly perimeter-based offense with ZERO post presence inside. In Beasley, you have a player who is a more explosive version of David West/Bernard King type. He's also seems to be a player capable to being leaned on, because the Bulls have no leader whatsoever (okay, maybe Joakim Noah. Only guy on the team that looks like he gives a damn), and he could lay a strong foundation in Chicago for years to come. Oh, and he's 19.

But from the conversations I've had with other pundits of the game, they all say take Derrick Rose. "Ed, point guards like that don't grow on trees." I know that, you have to plant the point guard in the ground first, then it grows on trees. Idiot. Anyway, Derrick Rose is a phenomenal player right now and can do everything you need. Penetrate, dish, defend, and score. He's a three-point shot and having some court savvy away from being a complete player in the league right now. The Bulls have ZERO players on the team now who are explosive, and D. Rose is the epitome of explosive. Oh, and he's 19, too.

**I just realized something, the Bulls are really bad. They remind me a lot of the Sonics back in 2004-05. A team full of jump shooters (Ray Allen, Rashard Lewis, Brent Barry, Vlad Radmonivic), and that's about it. They caught luck in a bottle and won a very weak Northwest division that year with 52 wins and lost in the first round against the Kings. The Bulls remind me of them; made the playoffs under Scott Skiles direction, beat the Heat in a sweep in round one and seemed destined for greatness. They were young, they hustled, played defense, and were a bunch of jump shooters. Now, they don't hustle and don't play defense, and they suck.**

My point is this: of course they can't really go wrong with either pick, but it seems to me that Beasley could add some offensive diversity to their team and a much needed physical presence. Now Beasley has to continue to work on being an inside guy, as he's had the tendency to drift out to the perimeter on occasion. At this point, if I'm the Bulls GM, I take Beasley number one.

And the Miami Heat have the easiest, greatest seat in the house. With the number two pick, they don't even have to work at all. I'd say the Heat are playoff-bound in '09 with a healthy Dwyane Wade, Shawn Marion, Udonis Haslem, and either Rose/Beasley.


D-Wade and Big Homie, we big pimpin with the number two pick...


Let me know what you think at ed@edthesportsfan.com and give me your feedback on who should go number one.

-Ed.

P.S. I'm a sports fan, so I'm going on record saying this now. I'm picking Chelsea in the upset, just because I hate Manchester United (they're like the Yankees when the Yankees were good.) My boy Drogba puts two in the ol' onion bags as Chelsea wins in an offensive showcase 3-2.

Drogba, he's the homie. Hold me down, fam.

*Images provided by slamonline.com and yahoo!

Comments

7 Responses to "Beasley vs. Rose"
  1. SoulOnIce said...
    Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:47:00 AM

    From the look of things, you think they should get Beasley. Well, for argument's sake, I'll say they should get Rose, and this, my brotha...is why.

    Look at the Bulls backcourt. Lets just take a look at it, and see what we have: Duhon, Hinrich, Larry Hughes, and Benjamin Gordon. Four decent players, four good players, but are any of them the type that you can TRULY rely on, to carry you to some victories??? I truly believe they have gotten pretty much all they can get from this crop of guards, as a unit. Don't get me wrong: I love watching Kirk Hinrich, but even I saw his performance last season, and have to admit that an upgrade at point guard is sorely needed.

    Insert Derrick Rose.

    Now lets look at the Bulls frontcourt. Nocioni, Tyrus Thomas, Noah, Deng, and Gooden. While their frontcourt doesn't scream intimidation, there is room for growth there. I don't see how it benefits them to take Beasley, just by going offa what I'm seeing right now (and this is coming from someone who loves Michael Beasley).

    I just think that after weighing their current situation, the best bet for them is to take Derrick Rose.

  2. Ed The Sports Fan said...
    Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:25:00 PM

    I have to disagree slightly, I think Ben Gordon can definitely be counted on. He can light it up every night. Sefolosha, has good potential at the 2. Larry Hughes, nope. Duhon, nope. Hinrich...eh, I don't think he has anyone helping to make his cause easier. He's a solid player, he got invited to Team USA's tryouts. He can play.

    This is my point, if Beasley's down inside he attracts the defense his way. Thus that 3-pointer Hinrich and Gordon have been shooting with people in his face is now more open. I also don't think its out the question that Beasley plays the 3 as well as the 4. I just don't really see him as a power forward, maybe its because of how he played at K-State.

    Your points are valid, but I still take Beasley #1.

    -Ed.

  3. ListenToLeon said...
    Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:08:00 PM

    I also think Beasley is the best choice. I like Luol Deng, but other than that, I'm not too big on their front line. I'm still not 100% sold on Tyrus Thomas, and Joakim Noah is athletic and passionate as it gets, but also just as one-dimensional. I think their big man situation needs addressing more than the guard one. That said, Derrick Rose could help them out, too. The Bulls and The Heat should benefit nicely from those picks.

  4. Ed The Sports Fan said...
    Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:10:00 PM

    Leon - Yeah, I'd say they are not bad with Deng at the 3, plus they have Gordon and Noah as main parts. Gooden can either play his role as the 4 or trade him. Larry Hughes too. Sefolosha is gonna be a bigtime player for Chicago before its all said and done. Hinrich's the X-Factor. They should just send him to the Rucker this summer and see how he does. If he gets housed then draft Rose, if he holds his own and gets a nickname like "Opie Taylor" then draft Beasley. At least that's what I would do if I was GM.

    -Ed.

  5. Stefan Ming said...
    Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:25:00 PM

    The Bulls have to take Rose. He is going to be a great PG, he's got it all, he's strong, physical, knows when to give up the rock, and can shoot. Unlike a lot of PGs out there he can be a go-to scorer.

    The Bulls already have some good forwards in Tyrus Thomas, Luol Deng, Joakim Noah, and Drew Gooden. Plus they could always possibly dish Kirk Heinrich for a big guy. And he's a local Chicago boy! Come on Bulls take Rose!

  6. DC said...
    Saturday, May 24, 2008 8:02:00 PM

    OJ Mayo should go #3, just my opinion. If Rose goes #1 then all of Chicago will be happy but the Bulls will be in the Lottery again in 2009.

    DC

  7. jdilla said...
    Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:51:00 PM

    LOL

Post a Comment

Drop a line folks...no anonymous commenters!

Related Posts with Thumbnails
 

Copyright 2009 All Rights Reserved Revolution Two Church theme by Brian Gardner | Blogger template converted & enhanced by eBlog Templates